In the process of addressing the
increased incidence of anorexia and bulimia nervosa, there are numerous stakeholders
that would be affected. A stakeholder is a person, group, or organization that
is impacted by the issue of eating disorders and would be impacted by an
intervention. Which stakeholders are
specifically involved depends on the particular intervention that is designed
to improve the issue. Possible interventions include an in school education
campaign about eating disorders, school mandated quarterly physicals, and
insurance covered therapy once diagnosed with the disorder.
In a school oriented education
campaign, the signs, symptoms, and complications of eating disorders, as well
as the importance of healthy eating habits and high self-esteem, would be promoted
throughout the school. This could be done by monthly assemblies, morning media
briefs, signs and posters throughout the school, after-school classes, and/or
through clubs and organizations who go from class to class. In such an
intervention, the stakeholders would include: the students, the school board,
the teachers, school staff, as well as those who organize and implement the
campaign. In order for a campaign to work in schools across the nation,
students would need to get on board and be willing to participate. Students
would be needed to distribute and post signs, to participate in a club that
promotes eating disorder awareness, and would need to support a campaign for it
to be effective. The school board and school staff would need to find such a
campaign important enough to fund and to find time in a school schedule for it
to be implemented. They might oppose such an intervention considering eating
disorders are not extremely prevalent and a campaign would cost money and
staffing. However, if the board could be convinced that the students would get
on board and help spread awareness, they might be willing to adopt it. The
organizers and creators of a campaign would need to design the most efficient way
for students to be educated, and would be the ones entering schools and
providing the assemblies and information that is to be taught.
Another intervention could be
school mandated quarterly physicals, where the height and weight of each
student is checked four times during the school year. By checking weight more
frequently, an onset of an eating disorder can be more quickly diagnosed and
thus stopped sooner. This intervention would affect the students, their
parents, the school board, and the school staff. Students would have to be
weighed more often and in a school setting, which might make some uncomfortable
and annoyed. Parents, additionally, might oppose their kids being forced to
undergo frequent weigh-ins, which they might deem unnecessary. To accommodate complaints,
students and parents could be assured that the weights would be kept private so
the students feel more comfortable. The school board would have to find a way
to fund this as well as to make schools comply with it. They might oppose this
simply because of the cost of funding, as they might not see it as worth the
money since eating disorders are relatively rare. The staff of each individual
school would need to hire a nursing staff, if not already present, and find a
way to track and organize the physical of each student.
Lastly, an intervention that would
take place after the diagnosis of an eating disorder could be the implementing
of health insurance paid therapy for anorexic and bulimic patients. A patient
suffering from an eating disorder needs to change their mental health before
their physical health can improve. If not, they may relapse and continue down
the disordered path. Since therapy is often very expensive and cannot be
afforded by many, therapy sessions paid by the health insurance companies could
improve how fast a patient recovers and reduce the likelihood of a relapse. Stakeholders
would include the insurance companies, the therapists, and the patients. Insurance
companies would have to find a way to cover therapy sessions, which would undoubtedly
be a difficult task. They might oppose this because eating disorders occur in
such a small percentage of people, and generally in adolescents who are not paying
for their own insurance. Therapists would have to agree to a more likely lower
cost of service, if the insurance companies were to come on board. The patients
would have to be willing to take the time to attend these sessions as well as
willing to be open minded in these sessions, as not to waste them. To accommodate
all of these concerns, group therapy sessions could be conducted. This would
produce a support team for patients, provide more payment for the therapists,
and ease the cost by each individual’s insurance company.
Hi Alyssa,
ReplyDeleteNice work identifying stakeholders for each of the interventions you mentioned. I wonder if the frequent weigh-ins would actually make things worse because the kids might become more concerned if their weight is increasing?
Erin
You did a good job identifying the stakeholders for your problem statement. I thought your intervention strategies were good and I think there's a high possibility some of them will help the issue you're dealing with.
ReplyDeleteThis is the first time I'm commenting on one of your blogs since you established your problem statement. I think that the problem you're attempting to tackle is very interesting and I'm interested in seeing the rest of the work you do for it, for your paper.