The most common form of
intervention that is currently in place to address anorexia and bulimia nervosa
are various forms of therapy, such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and
Family Based Therapy (FBT).
CBT is a form of therapy only
recommended once weight has been stabilized in the patient first (ED 1). This
type of therapy helps patients understand the thoughts and feelings that cause
them to act the way they do, allowing them to change the destructives thoughts
that negatively influence them (Cherry 1). Anorexics and bulimics that receive
CBT had lower rates of relapse and better outcomes than those who did not (ED
1). In this type of therapy, the key determinants that are addressed all have
to do with the mindset and mental issues of the patient, including poor body
image, peer factors (dealing with negative comments and teasing), and the media
(changing the way the patient views media images).
FBT requires the entire family
of the patient to attend therapy sessions (ED 1). In this type of therapy, the
entire family deals with the issues that are affecting the patient, which helps
with the family’s understanding of the disorder and its recovery in order to
create a healing environment for the patient (ED 1). Like CBT, FBT helps with
the key determinants: poor body image, peer factors, and the media, but
additionally addresses parental factors by improving family communication and
working through family issues.
In order to
improve the issue of eating disorder in the female youth population, a few possible
interventions include an in school education campaign about eating disorders, online
educational program for coaches, and insurance covered therapy once diagnosed
with the disorder.
In a school
oriented education campaign, which would be a primary intervention, the signs,
symptoms, and complications of eating disorders, as well as the importance of
healthy eating habits and high self-esteem, would be promoted throughout the
school. This could be done by monthly assemblies, morning media briefs, signs
and posters throughout the school, after-school classes, and/or through clubs
and organizations. The key determinants that would be addressed would be peer
factors, since it might encourage students to refrain from teasing about other
students’ weight and poor body image by promoting healthy attitudes about self-image.
Another primary
intervention could target female adolescents in sport teams, such as dance,
gymnastics, and cheerleading, since the prevalence of eating disorders is
significantly greater in these populations. This intervention would entail a
nationwide education program for coaches of these at risk teams. If these
coaches could be educated on how to recognize eating disorders and how to
promote a healthy body image amongst their athletes through an online program,
the rates of anorexia and bulimia in these groups could be decreased. The key
determinants that would be addressed would be the higher pressures faces by
females in sport teams and poor body image through the promotion of high self
esteem.
Lastly, a secondary intervention, which would take place after the
diagnosis of an eating disorder, could be the implementing of health insurance
paid therapy for anorexic and bulimic patients. A patient suffering from an
eating disorder needs to change their mental health in addition to their
physical health. If they don't, they could relapse and continue down the
disordered path. Since therapy is often very expensive and cannot be afforded
by all, therapy sessions paid by the health insurance companies could improve
how fast a patient recovers and reduce the likelihood of a relapse. The key
determinants that would be addressed would be poor body image, family factors,
peer factors, and the media, since therapists would help the patient work
through all of these types of mental thoughts and issues.
Decision Matrix: (3 – best, 1 – worst)
|
Options
Decision
Criteria |
Intervention 1:
School Education Campaign
|
Intervention 2:
Online Program to Educate Coaches
|
Intervention 3:
Health Insurance Paid Therapy
|
|
Effectiveness
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
|
Feasibility
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
|
Sustainability
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
|
Cost
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
|
Cost
effectiveness
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
|
Political
acceptability
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
|
Social
will
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
|
Potential
for unintended risks
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
|
Potential for unintended benefits |
2
|
2
|
2
|
|
Total/conclusion
|
18
|
23
|
14
|
According
to the decision matrix, the intervention with the greatest possibility of
success would be the online program to educate coaches of high-risk athletic
teams. I used the criteria that we used for the lab because I felt this
encompassed many, if not all, the criteria that should be considered when
attempting to implement any sort of public health intervention. It is important
to not only look at thinks like how effective and feasible an intervention
could be, but also how costly and politically acceptable it is as well. Even if
an intervention seems ideal on the drawing board, if it is extremely difficult
to put into place, due to cost or lack of acceptance, it won’t work. Thus, the
online program, which would be the cheapest and acceptable, even if it might
not be the most likely to succeed, is
the best-recommended intervention.
Works Cited
Cherry, Kendra.
"What Is Cognitive Behavior Therapy?" About.com Psychology.
N.p., n.d. Web.
19
Apr. 2013.
"Eating
Disorders: Best Practices in Prevention and Intervention." Mental
Health and Spiritual
Health
Care. N.p., 2006. Web.
19 Apr. 2013.
Alyssa,
ReplyDeleteYou have done a very nice job on this assignment. You brought me up to date on current strategies used to address your problem and mentioned the key determinants pertinent to these strategies. You also mention three potential strategies and describe key determinants. I'm very glad you used the decision matrix, and feel that based on this you have chosen a wise intervention. You then convinced me this was the best choice. Strong work.
Erin